According to the PPG's update released today, Buffalo’s charter gives the city ultimate authority over police discipline, even though the police contract allows officers to challenge disciplinary decisions. Miles Gresham, Policy Fellow at the PPG, says courts have backed this up.

“The New York Court of Appeals, which is the highest court in New York State, has held since at least 2006 that where a city was granted charter authority over police discipline before 1958, that charter authority trumps the disciplinary rules and police contracts. Buffalo has that charter authority," he said. "In other words, even though Buffalo has a police contract that allows officers to challenge disciplinary decisions, Buffalo isn't legally bound to follow those rules.”

Those backing the PPG’s brief say the Common Council can, and should, pursue some reforms, including the process by which officers are reviewed.

Attorney Brittany Penberthy recommends a change to the Buffalo Police Department's internal affairs process, allowing civilian input.

“Right now, I think in our community, most recently, it's the public relying upon the news or social media to bring change. And that's unfortunate," she said. "It's unfortunate that we don't have the strength or the confidence that in internal agency or an internal division isn't going to properly police their police.”

Gresham suggests the report, although it mentions police unions frequently, is not anti-union.

"Unions and collective bargaining rights are vital to labor rights and the protection of the middle class and the working class in this country. But police unions are a category apart, and they should be seen as such," he said. "Police unions represent laborers with special powers, namely the power to detain, injure and kill people in the interest of public safety. And it's important that those special powers be subordinate to representative government in a free society."

Read the article on the WBFO website here.